Technologies

Interactive Case Study Technology Dashboard

Interactive Case Study Dashboard


Energy flexible building managing models

Already
today buildings can be realised in the nearly-zero and plus energy standard.
These buildings achieve extremely low energy demands and low CO2
emissions and can be operated economically. For this reason, the motivation in
the CRAVEzero project is not only based on the energy characteristics of
buildings, but also on their life-cycle costs and building operation, which is
supporting the large-scale integration of fluctuating renewable energies in the
building itself, but also in higher-level electricity grids. For the
integration of fluctuating renewable energies (i) the integration and
intelligent operation of storages (electric and thermal) as well as smart
operation and management strategies are needed.

CRAVEzero_D43_Energy_flexible_building_managing_models

(more…)

Results of optimised nZEB parametric models

Cost performance (EUR/m²) of the case study Aspern IQ over the whole life cycle of the building; comparison of nZEB variant with a building accord-ing to the CRAVEzero approach and the average value

Already
today buildings can be realised in the nearly zero and plus energy standard.
These buildings achieve extremely low energy demands and low CO2
emissions and can be operated economically. For this reason, the motivation in
the CRAVEzero project is not only based on the energy characteristics of
buildings, but also on their life cycle costs. However, the broad market
deployment of these buildings is progressing very slowly so far, as methods and
processes for the cost-optimal integration of efficiency measures and renewable
energies are not yet sufficiently described and therefore not yet familiar. As
a consequence – many poorly planned buildings are criticised for the fact that
the actual energy consumption of highly efficient buildings is higher than the
predicted demand and that high-efficiency standards are expensive and
uneconomical. The influence of the user behaviour of such energy-efficient
buildings is another aspect, which has to be considered to evaluate the impact
on the energy consumption of the building.

“bubble chart” of the case study Aspern IQ; bubble size indicates the average CO2 emissions; bubble position is determined by average investment costs and average life cycle costs
“bubble chart” of the case study Aspern IQ; bubble size indicates the average CO2 emissions; bubble position is determined by average investment costs and average life cycle costs

The
identification of suitable methods for the energetic-economic optimization of
highly efficient buildings in all life cycle phases is a prerequisite for the
broad market implementation.

This
method was developed earlier in the CRAVEzero project and documented in
Deliverable D6.1 “Parametric models for buildings and building clusters:
Building features and boundaries”.

In this
Deliverable D6.2, the method was applied to the five CRAVEzero case studies Aspern
IQ, Alizari, Isola Nel Verde, Les Heliades and MORE to perform parametric
calculations and to perform multi-objective energy and cost analysis over the
life cycle of the buildings.

Specific costs (EUR/m²) in the different phases of the case study Aspern IQ over the whole life cycle of the building; range between the different parameters indicated as minimum (min), average and maximum (max) values; per-centages represent the deviation from the average value

In total, more than 230,000 variants were calculated and analysed, with the key performance indicators: financing costs, net present value, balanced primary energy demand and balanced CO2 emission. The calculation results can be found in this report as well as on the CRAVEzero pinboard: http://www.cravezero.eu/pinboard/Dashboard/DBInfo.htm

(more…)

Parametric models for buildings

Download the full report here:

Figure1: Analysis of the balanced primary energy demand related to the net present value for the different technology combinations for case study Solallen.

Already today buildings can be realised in the nearly zero and plus energy standard. These buildings achieve extremely low energy demands and low CO2 emissions and can be operated economically. For this reason, the motivation in the CRAVEzero project is not only based on the energy characteristics of buildings, but also on their life-cycle costs. However, the broad market deployment of these buildings is progressing very slowly so far, as methods and processes for the cost-optimal integration of efficiency measures and renewable energies are not yet sufficiently described and therefore not yet common. As a consequence – many poorly planned buildings are criticised for the fact that the actual energy consumption of highly efficient buildings is higher than the predicted demand and that high-efficiency standards are expensive and uneconomical. The influence of the user behaviour of such energy efficient buildings is another aspect, which has to be considered to evaluate the impact on the energy consumption of the building.

The identification of suitable methods for the energetic-economic optimisation of highly efficient buildings in all life-cycle phases is a prerequisite for the broad market implementation.

On the basis of the results, the statement is confirmed: nZEBs are economical. It can now be shown that the additional costs of efficiency measures are so low that highly efficient buildings have the lowest life-cycle costs. nZEB measures only have a small percentage influence on construction costs, but can reduce CO2 emissions many times over. When considered over the service life, these measures are usually cost-neutral or even economical as can be seen in Figure 2.

Figure2: net present value (€/m²) relation to the balanced CO2 emissions (kgCO2/(m²a)) of all variants of the case study Solallén

Figure3: Cost performance (€/m²))of the case study Solallén over the whole life-cycle of the building; comparison of nZEB variant with a building according to the CRAVEzero approach

(more…)

nZEB technology guideline is online

Download the full report here:

Different technologies are necessary to achieve the energy standard of nZEBs.​​ They can be summarised in three​​ main categories​​ (i)​​ Passive Energy Efficiency solutions, (ii)​​ Active Energy Efficiency solutions​​ and (iii)​​ Renewable​​ Energies. All approaches/ technologies are needed in order to realise nZEBs. And all of them play a major role in the CRAVEzero frontrunner buildings!

An excellent thermal insulation​​ and air-tightness of the building are of major importance, which can be seen in the rather low U-values of the building envelope elements in the case study buildings (opaque elements​​ between​​ 0.07 and 0.25​​ W/(m²K), windows mainly between 0.7 and 1.2 W/(m²K)).​​ In addition to adequate insulation, shading, usable thermal mass, natural ventilation and passive cooling possibilities are essential to minimise the energy demand of the buildings.

For the supply of the remaining energy demand for heating and cooling, highly efficient technologies using – if applicable – renewable energies should be installed. In the case study buildings, mainly heat pumps and district heating with low specific emissions are used – in several cases in combination with solar thermal. Boilers only play a minor role (see figure below). In addition and for the integration of renewable energies, in most buildings thermal storages are installed.

Concerning renewable energies, solar technologies and specifically PV are the dominant technologies used in the CRAVEzero frontrunner buildings (see figure below). Both​​ PV and solar thermal​​ are well developed and relatively easy to install on or at buildings.​​ They do and will play a major role in nZEBs as these buildings are only possible with the use of onsite renewable technologies.

A detailed description of the technologies installed in the CRAVEzero case study buildings can be found in the recently published Guideline II: nZEB Technologies available here.

Download the full report here:

NZEB Construction Market

The building sector in Europe is responsible for approximately 40% of the total energy consumption. The percentage accounted for residential buildings amounts at 27% of the total. Hence, this sector has a key role in the path towards the enhancement of energy efficiency and reduction of greenhouse emissions at EU level. The EPBD, together with the Energy Efficiency Directive and the Renewable Energy Directive, established a set of measures with the aim to provide in Europe the conditions for significant and long-term improvements in the energy performance of the construction market.

The EPBD established that, starting from 2021 (2019 for public buildings), all new buildings must be nZEB. On average, the volume of housing development across Europe amounts 2.8 completed apartments per 1000 citizens (Figure 1). The number of households, at European level, is expected to increase by more than 15% by 2050 compared to the number measured in 2013.

Figure 1: Number of completed dwellings per 1000 citizens (Deloitte, 2017).

(more…)

Technologies

A collection of materials and information, to the definition of effective low-cost technology solution sets for new NZEBs and to support the exploitation of renewables available on site.